A DISCOURSE ON LOKADHAMMA

PONDERING UPON GAIN AND LOSS

So the Buddha's disciple should ponder upon the impermanence of the gifts and gains when they come, and also upon the troubles that are attending upon wealth and prosperity. Here, troubles do not relate to physical discomforts and ills; they relate to the illusions resulting from enjoyment of the pleasures and the pains and sorrows caused respectively by the gain and the loss. The dukkha referred to here is of three kinds: sankhara dukkha, viparinama dukkha and pariyaya dukkha. Sankhara dukkha is the result of the impermanence and unpleasantness of things that happen and also their utter helplessness. The gain made is liable to be destroyed and such perishableness is unpleasant, undesirable. And that is dukkha, or sankhara dukkha. The second kind, viparinima dukkha, is occasioned by the changes and destruction of the things one has gained. If one does not continue getting the things or if the things already got or gained are lost or destroyed, this kind of dukkha will happen. Pariyaya dukkha is, in fact, included in the second kind because it relates to the cause of dukkha. So the one who gets and gains things should ponder upon the impermanence and perishableness of the things so gained and also upon the perishabieness of the owner of these things. That is right thinking.


If one does so, one will not be overwhelmed by joy and satisfaction the gains may have brought. "The right thinking person's feeling of joy will soon disappear; it will not remain long with him," said the Buddha. In the same manner, the sorrow that may be occasioned in the mind of the right thinking person will be short-lived. Such persons will say that gains come when they come and go when they go. Some more will probably come when circumstances are favourable. " I was born with nothing on, and now with whatever I have had, I am fully equipped," they would think. They would also ponder upon the perishable nature of all things.


Now, let us see. An earthen pot breaks when it falls but a pot made of metal doesn't. That is just natural. One should take into consideration the nature of things and accept the results with a calm mind. There are instances, however, of older people getting angry when young people break things by letting them fall. These old people often failed to recognize the nature of things. A broken thing cannot become whole and entire even if one mourns over it. So we should always ponder upon the impermanent and perishable nature of things and accept the consequences with an accommodating attitude called in Pali: yoniso-manasikara.

If one can take things as they happen, with a sense of acceptance and accommodation, one will not suffer so much from losses. For an ordinary person, puthujjana, the suffering diminishes; fur Sotapan and sakadagamthis suffering is much less, and for Arahat there is no suffering at all. The person who can control his mind over the gain and the loss of wealth will have ample time to obtain a meritorious mental state. When one gets gains, one can expel the mental state of joy and possession by making a note of that mental state. In the same way, one can make a note of dejection and thus expel it when one is faced with losses. If at all such dejection occurs, it will fade away soon. And there will be peace of mind. The Buddha said that the one who is not glad of gains, and sorry for losses will not hanker after gains or feel dejected over losses. Such a person will be doing his own work, that is, the meditation practice.

 

FREE FROM MISERY

The disciple of the Buddha who has expel led joy and sorrow alike will be free from rebirth, old age and death," said the Buddha.


What the Buddha taught is that if one does not let his emotions loose on the gains and the losses that may occur to him he will be able to devote his time to making a note of anicca, dukkha and anatta nature of all things physical and mental, and eventually such a person will be able to attain nibbana. Once he has attained that state, there will be no new existence for him, and thus he is liberated from the misery of old age and death. If one has attained sotapanna maggananna, one will go through not more than seven existences before one attains the ultimate state at which there is no more new existence, that is, nibbana, the end of samsara. For sakadagam there are at most two more existences, and for anagam just one more existence before attainment of nibbana. If one becomes an Arahat in the present existence, there is no more new existences for him.


The one unmoved by gains or losses is free from sorrow, dejection and misery; in fact, all kinds of misery. "That I say for sure," the Buddha said. Freedom from misery of all kinds bears fruit of mental pence even in the present existence. By pondering upon the anicca, dukkha and anatta nature of all things gained or lost, one will not be moved to sorrow, and will, thus, gain peace of mind. This peace can be gained even in the present existence if one is so unmoved.

 

BEST METHOD OF RIDDING ANXIETY

The Buddha said, "The method of ridding anxiety, sorrow, dejection and mourning is following the path of four kinds of Satipatthana. That is the only way to eliminate misery."


So this is the best way of ridding misery because this is the only way to attaining arahatship and thus gaining complete freedom from all kinds of misery. That is the assurance the Buddha gave.


This relates so far to the first pair of Lokadhamma, that is, having gains and losses. The results of the Satipatthana practice relating to the other three pairs are the same. So I will speak briefly about them.

 

HAVING OR NOT HAVING COMPANY

When the informed disciple of the Buddha has a full complement of companions and servants, he ponders upon that situation with a noting of anicca, dukkha and anatta nature Of all things. He knows that he will not always be so furnished, and also that there are troubles over the affairs of family, servants and the retinue. They can be separated from him for one reason or another, and if he ponders upon that impermanent nature of the situations he will not suffer from dukkha when actual separation happens. He can control his mind and thus find relief. He will realise that it is better to live alone because then one is free from responsibilities and encumbrances. So if left alone, one will not feel sorry but, on the contrary, one will even feel happy; he will not be affected by the deprivation. As one is thus not overwhelmed by sorrow, one will have time to devote to the meditation practice and achieve freedom from all kinds of misery.

 

COMMENDATION AND CONDEMNATION

Also, when one is showered with praises, one must ponder upon the impermanent state of the acclamation. One must consider the fact that praises are given to "me" who is after all an aggregate of rupa and nama, for there is no "I", and that soon enough that "I" will be spat with condemnation and contempt. One must remain unmoved, and thus find peace of mind. One must think of living a sinless life and thus acquire real benefit so that one will not lose anything from others' criticism or condemnation. If one can do that, one will not be affected too much by other people's opinions and will have time to do meditation practice and thus seek one's way out of all kinds of misery.

 

CONNECTION BETWEEN SUKHA AND DUKKHA

We must ponder upon the situation where prosperity and well-being prevail in this way:


Although I am now enjoying whatever I wish to have I won't get them always, for when unfavourable circumstances come, all these desirable things will disappear and I will be in trouble. Now I am healthy and comfortable and this sukha is, after all, subject to changes, and so when sukha is changed to dukkha, I will surely suffer. Even now, as I am enjoying the good things of life, I discern that all things, including myself, are in the nature of anicca, dukkha and anatta." If you are prepared thus, you will suffer little and lightly when sukha is changed to dukkha under changed circumstances.


In the same manner, when dukkha comes, you must ponder upon the anicca, dukkha and anatta nature of things, and say to your self that dukkha will not prevail all the time, and when circumstances changes, its reverse, sukha, will come. If it doesn't come during this life-time, it will surely come in the next existence because all things are subject to change viparinama. Even during this life-time, changes for the better will come by force of the good deeds you have done. If you ponder thus, the sting of misery will not be so sharp, and you will find relief. If you persistently make a note of the dukkha that is occurring to you, your samadhi will develop and the sorrow and dejection will fade out, and you will feel happiness.

 

VERY EFFECTIVE REMEDY

If you suffer from ill-effects owing to someone's efforts, or to diseases, or to climatic conditions, and if you have no other remedy to alleviate the pain and suffering, the meditation practice upon the suffering of illness can give at least some relief if it cannot give you a complete cure. If the pain and suffering remain in your body, the meditation practice could render relief to your mind. But if you are either angry or irritated by the physical suffering, your mind will suffer also. The Buddha compared this dual suffering to being pierced by two thorns at the same time.


Let us say a man has a thorn in his flesh, and he tries to extract the thorn by piercing another thorn into his flesh. The second thorn breaks into the flesh without being able to extract the first thorn. Then the man suffers the pain from the two thorns at the same time. So also, the person who cannot make a note of the physical pain in a meditation manner, suffers both physical and mental pain. But if he can ponder well upon the physical pain, he will suffer only that pain and will not suffer mental pain.


This kind of suffering only physical pain, is like that suffered by the Buddha and Arahats for they, too, suffer physical pain. They suffer from the ill-effects of heat and cold, flea-bite and other kinds of discomfort. Though they suffer from the physical dukkha, their minds remain stable, so they do not suffer mental pain. So the meditation method is the best remedy for physical pain and suffering. There are instances of relief gained by this method for those suffering agony as severe as death-agony.


The informed person who is a disciple of the Buddha can ponder upon the true nature of sukha when it occurs, and thus save himself from being overwhelmed by joy, and when dukkha comes, save himself from overwhelming misery, and thus maintain equanimity. Only this method can overcome the Lokadhamma changes in life. When one's mind is calm and stable despite the onslaughts of Lokadhamma,, one will have an opportunity of maintaining: a noble mental state by making constant note of the changes occurring in the six "doors" of the body, and pondering upon the anicca, dukkha and anatta nature. Constant meditation practice will develop one's mental state, that is,, vipassana nanaand gradually gain the four stages of ariya magga. Thus, will he be liberated from the meshes of misery. This assurance the Buddha gave.


The variables of Lokadhamma prevail in all planes of existence and nobody, not even the Buddha, is exempt from them. The Buddha, however, can receive the onslaught with great patience and stability of mind. We should take this example and work hard. People naturally wish for good things in life and try their best to get them, and at the same time they try to avoid the bad things and pains and sufferings but nobody can escape from their onslaughts. As has been said, even the Buddha cannot get away from them. We must, therefore, say to ourselves, "Even the Buddha cannot get away from the onslaughts of Lokadhamma; how can such an ordinary person like me hope to do so ?" Thinking upon the patience and the equanimity of the Buddha when receiving such onslaughts, we should try our best to follow His example. I will now tell you something about the ill-effects of Lokadhamma the Buddha had suffered.

 

ALABHA AND THE BUDDHA

Once the Buddha was residing near a Brahmin village called Pancasala. The reason for His stay was that He foresaw that 500 maidens of that village would attain the stage of sotapanna On the day for ceremonial worshipping of the planets, the young maidens were permitted to get out of the village and go to the riverside to bathe. They were returning to the village after the bath. At that time the Buddha went out into the Pancasala village for alms-food.


The name Pancasala means "five houses". The village was founded by only five households and later it developed, and became a larger village. Since there were five hundred maidens the population of the village must be not less than two thousand and there would naturally be many houses, as many as a hundred or so.


The villagers were then under the spell of Mara, the evil god, and so they could not prepare alms-food for the Buddha. So the Buddha did not receive even one spoonful of rice. On his return, Mara asked the Buddha, "Bhikkhu, did you get alms-food ?" The Buddha then said, " Mara, you prevented the villagers from offering me food, didn't you? "Mara then said, " Would you please go back and walk around for food?" He meant to make the villagers jeer at the Buddha.


At that moment the five hundred maidens had arrived at the village-gate on their return from the riverside. They worshipped the Buddha and sat down at an appropriate distance. Mara asked the Buddha, "If you don't get food, don't you feel misery? " The Buddha had come to this village to get this occasion so that He could deliver a sermon for the five hundred maidens. So the Buddha said, "Hey, Mara! Even if I don't get anything to eat today, I will remain in piti sukha (joyfulness) like the great Brahma of Abhassara plane of existence." Meant especially for the five hundred maidens, the Buddha said in the following Pali verse;


Susukham vata jivama
yesam no natthi kincanam.
Pitibhakkha bhavissama
deva abhassara yatha.


We do not have any desire to possess nor do we have anxiety arising out of raga (sexual desire) and kilesa (defilement). We live happily. For today, like the Brahmas of Abhassara, we live on the food of piti (joy)."


People kill, rob and steal to make a living. They do business by lying and cheating. Such people think that they achieve happiness by enjoying the fruit of their misdeeds but really they arc in for misery, for they are going to hell because of their misdeeds. Even if one earns one's livelihood by honest means, one cannot be said to earn one's living happily unless such pursuits are free of desires and anxiety. As for the Buddha, there was no raga arising from desire and anxiety or dosaarising from disappointment at being denied the wants or moha arising from false notions of what is good. The Buddha was free of kilesa and thus remained calm with mental stability despite the fact that He did not get any alms-food on that day. This is indeed happiness from dhamma. So our Buddha lived happily despite hardships.


However, it may be asked whether the Buddha could live happily without food for the day. All beings in the kama (sensual) planes of existence are obliged to have the four requirements (kamma, citta, utu and ahara) to keep themselves alive, that is, to maintain their physical existence. One can possibly keep oneself alive with the first three; one surely requires to have ahara or food. Man has to take food two or three times a day. Animals have to go out to get food. Of the three factors of life, namely, food, clothing and shelter, food is the most important. To go out to get food is the greatest trouble, and all beings are in constant search of food. The ants are industrious; they move about to seek food day and night. They cannot remain calm and stable without food. Then asked about food, the Buddha replied that, like the Brahmas of Abhassara region in the celestial world, piti was the food.


The Brahmas do not eat food. They are always in a state of jhana out of which conic piti sukha, and they live on it. They are never hungry; they are always in piti sukha which is highly developed when they have attained the second stage of jhana. Of the Brahmas who have attained this second stage, the Brahmas of Abhassara region have the most distinctive kind of piti sukha. That is why the Buddha said that He could remain happy like the Brahmas of Abhassara region although lie did not have food to eat for that day.


Joy can be substituted for food. That fact is borne out as clearly in the mundane world as in the spiritual world. Some persons are overjoyed at the success of something they have worked so hard to accomplish and while that great joy lasts they have no desire for food or sleep. Those who feel joy over some meritorious deeds that they have done, can remain without one or two meals. Those who are deep in meditation remain sitting for one or two days without getting up to take food or to urinate or defecate. The Buddha could remain calmly sitting for one whole week when He was in phala samapatti or niroda samapatti. He could remain without food quite easily for one day simply by going into vipassana. So He said that piti was the food for Him for that day. The reply was made by the Buddha to Mara's question, but the five hundred maidens heard this sermon and all of them attained the state of sotapannana.

Why did these maidens become sotapan merely by hearing the Buddha's simple reply to Mara's question? The reason lies in the fact that these maidens had had special parami (perfect virtues.) They had had an opportunity to see the Buddha in person and worship Him and also to hear His sermon. So they were overwhelmed with joy (piti) and also confidence in the Buddha arising from their conviction of His nobleness as evidenced in His being clean of kilesa and His piti despite deprivation of food for that day. They pondered upon the anicca, dukkha and anatta nature of the Buddha's piti, and thus gained insight leading to attainment of the state of sotapanna.

Now, the audience attending this discourse can also gain such insight and attainment if only they can clearly visualise the scene at the gate ofPancasala village and ponder upon the Buddha's reply to Mara's question. They can have piti, too, and if they ponder upon the piti meditationally, they can gain attainment similar to that attained by the five hundred maidens of the village.

 

MILINDA'S QUESTION

With reference to this incident at Pancasala village, KingMilinda put this question to Venerable Nagasena: "You all said that the Buddha had received plenty of gifts, the gifts in the form of robes, food, monastery and medicine, the four appropriate furnishings for a monk, and later you all said that the Buddha did not get even a spoonful of rice on His rounds for alms-food atPancasala village. These two statements are contradictory. If the Buddha had plenty of gifts, He should not have been said to have received not even a spoonful of rice. If so, it should not have been said of the Buddha that He had had plenty of gifts. Venerable Nagasena, please explain this discrepancy."

 

NAGASENA'S ANSWER

"King Milinda, it is correct to say that the Buddha had plenty of gifts. It is also correct to say that the Buddha did not get even a spoonful of rice at Pancasala village. But the fact that He did not get alms-food at Pancasala village, does not prove that the Buddha was in privation. Now let us say a villager came to the palace of an emperor with the gift of a honey pot or a bee-hive, the doorman of the royal palace said to the villager: ' This is not the time for his Majesty to meet visitors. Get away, or you'd be taken into custody. The villager was frightened and beat a retreat, taking away with him the gift that he had meant to make to the emperor. The emperor was deprived of this gift, but does that mean that the emperor was in a state of privation?


"In the same way, the Buddha had been having plenty of gifts but in that instance, Mara acting like the doorman of the emperor, had prevented the villagers from offering the Buddha the alms-food. Does that prove that the Buddha was in privation? You shouldn't take it that way. Except for that single day, the Buddha had for forty-five Lents, that is, for over sixteen thousand four hundred days, had plenty of gifts offered Him daily. So it is correct to say that the Buddha had had plenty of gifts." So said Venerable Nagasena in reply to the King's question.


We must know that in view of the dana parami which the Buddha in His earlier existences for four eons and one hundred thousand worlds had fulfilled, He had had an enormous amount of gifts of all kinds. Yet for one day at least He had to suffer privation owing to the evil machinations of Mara: He had confronted the alabha phase of Lokadhamma for that short time. As for us, ordinary human beings, the phases of Lokadhamma will visit us without fail. If we can follow in the footsteps of the Buddha with great confidence in Him and cultivate patience to withstand the onslaughts of adversity, we will be relieved to a certain extent of the pangs of misery.

 

BUDDHA HAD TO TAKE MAYAW RICE

Once, twelve years after having attained the Buddhahood, the Buddha went to a town called Veranja in Western Part of India. He sat down underneath a neem tree called Naleru near that town. The tree was so named after the ogre who had taken possession of it. Just as we have in Burma certain trees said to have been possessed by some spirit and called by the name of that spirit. With the Buddha were five hundred bhikkhus.


At that time a certain brahmin who was a resident of that town came to the Buddha and laid charges, and the Buddha gave the accusing brahmin a sermon, and the brahmin attained the state of sotapanna. So the brahmin requested the Buddha to spend the current Lent at that town. The Buddha granted that request, and He and His five hundred disciples spent the Lent there.


The brahmin of Veranja had requested the Buddha to stay for the Lent but he had not offered to build a monastery for Him, and the hundred disciples had to seek shelter wherever available near that tree. The shelters for them were probably the smaller neem trees around that big neem tree. As there was a drought in that year, the monks did not have trouble from getting wet with rain.


During that stay Mara was doing his evil work. He made the people living within a radius of one yujana(roughly six miles) ignorant of the Buddha, the monks and religion. Besides, there was a famine. People themselves were supplied with food under a ration system. in those times communication was so bad that distribution of goods must have been in a disastrous condition. The people were starving. There was no one in the town who would offer food to the monks.


At that time five hundred horse-dealers from Kashmir in Northern India arrived at that town. As there was famine, there was no one to buy a horse, but the rains had come to their home district and they were obliged to remain in that town. These horse-dealers were willing to offer food to the Buddha and His disciples but as they were mere sojourners they had no facilities to make the offering a daily affair. They had with them a large supply of pulaka or a tough kind of wheat for feeding their horses. This could be unhusked and boiled and eaten. The term pulaka has been often translated as mayaw rice. The horse-dealers fed their horses only once instead of twice daily as they used to do, and offered the horse-food to the Buddha and the monks. As they were just sojourners they could not afford to cook the wheat and offer the cooked meal. The monks had to make-do with what was offered them.


The wheat had to be boiled and the boiled wheat set in the sun to dry, and then the dried wheat had to be crushed or pounded and wetted with water and taken as meal. The work had to be done by groups of eight or ten monks each. The horse-dealers offered butter and honey also. The Venerable Ananda mixed wheat with butter and honey and offered the meal to the Buddha. It is said that devas put their celestial rood in the mixture. The Buddha accepted the food and after taking it, spent the entire day sitting under the great neem tree and went into phala samapatti. All the monks, with the exception of Venerable Ananda, were Arahats. Venerable Ananda was then only a sotapan. So, all the other monks were also sitting under their respective neem trees and entering into phala samapatti all day. in this manner the Buddha and the five hundred Arahats spent the entire Lent at that famine-ridden place. This is an instance which compels our admiration for the Buddha and His disciples.


To a person of ordinary intellect this episode is not quite a satisfactory one. lie would probably ask why the Buddha who had for so many life-times done meritorious and noble deeds should have been obliged to take this mean kind of food. And His disciples who were all Arahats should have to take such humble meal; why ? The answer is simple. Both the Buddha and the Arahats were not exempt from the lokadhamma. That should be a short and satisfactory answer. The answer in Pali version (in Apadam Pali Text) reads:


Phussassaham pavacane, savake pribhasayim.
Yavam khadatha bhunjatha, ma ca bhunjatha silayo.
Tena karmmavipakena, temasam khaditam yavam.
Nimantito brahmanena, verinjayam vasim tada.

The Buddha said, "During the time of Phussa Buddha I told His disciples to eat mayaw rice, not the softer and finer kind, salay rice. This I said by way of a threat. in retribution for this use of abusive language I had accepted the request of Verinja brahmin and spent the Lent at Verinja town mid was obliged to eat the rough horse food rice of mayaw kind."


It may be asked if it would not be better for the Buddha to avoid this particular town which was bewitched by Mara and go to another place to spend His lent. Retribution will follow the Buddha wherever He went, and so it makes no difference whether He stayed for the Lent at Verinja or elsewhere. Mara would follow him and play his tricks upon the residents who would have offered Him and His disciples almsfood. It had been better that He stayed at Verinja because it was there the horse-dealers stopped and offered at least mayaw rice to Him and His disciples.


Then it may be asked why Mara did not play his tricks upon the horse-dealers too. Well, he was a bit late. lie had bewitched the townspeople, and by then the horse-dealers had already made an offer of the mayaw rice to the Buddha and his disciples. Anything that had been offered to the Buddha could not be tempered with by anybody. That is what Milinda Panha and the Atthakathas have said.


We now know why the Buddha had to pay for the abusive language He had used in an earlier existence. What about His disciples, the five hundred bhikkhus? We may take it that if such a personality as the would-be Buddha had made such a speech-sin, these five hundred would-be Arahats must have committed similar sins in one of their previous existences.


All we will have to think about is that if such a personality as the Buddha had to pay a retribution in the form of being denied the gift or gain (alabha), we, ordinary persons, will surely be faced with such an adversity one day, and all we must do is to follow in the footsteps of the Buddha and endure the penury. We should ponder thus and, while being deeply respectful of the Buddha's patience and endurance, practise patience and endurance like film. We should also take notice of the patience and endurance of the Buddha's five hundred disciples who were obliged to pound the tough rice and eat it, the kind of rice much inferior to the meanest kind that we have at present, and find admiration for them


So the Buddha said: "Ananda, you, the good person, has achieved success. You have conquered lobha (greed) and mean desires."


The Buddha's conquest of the scarcity of food lay in ills infinite patience and endurance. The village of Verinja was famine stricken but the nearby villages were not; they were quite well-off. The Buddha's disciples did not blame the Buddha for having stayed at Verinja village. They all endured with patience. That is why the Buddha said to His secretary. Ananda, that all His disciples had achieved success.


Their conquest of lobha lay in the fact that these bhikkhus did not go for their alms-food for a distance which did not warrant return the same day, nor did they move to another place, thus breaking their vow of the Lent. Their conquest of their desire for obtaining gifts by base means lay in their refraining from advertising their nobleness, declaring to the people that they had attained Arahathood, in order to make the people want to offer them alms.


After the Buddha had praised the five hundred bhikkhus for their conquest of greed and base desires, He predicted that in future times monks would become greedy. He said: "Many of the monks of the future will be too choosy about the alms offered to them. They will say that that particular rice is too tough, or too soft, that particular curry is salty, or with too little salt, sour or cold." Such monks you can find today.

 

KING ASOKA AND HALF A GOOSEBERRY

Many of you know how powerful was King Siri Dhammasoka, and how rich he was. He could spend one hundred crones of the currency of his day on charity fur Buddhist religious purposes. Yet, at last, this rich and powerful King had only half a gooseberry, according to Visuddhi Magga:

sakalam medinm bhutva, datva kotisatam sukhi andamalakamatassa, ante issaratam gato.

"King Asoka was extremely rich, having enjoyed enormous revenue, spent one hundred crones of currency, but at last he was reduced to possession of half a gooseberry. Thus had he been deprived of his power and affluence.~~


The King was old and ailing, so his ministers turned over the royal treasury to his grandson, the Crown Prince. The King was so keen on giving alms that he gave away in charity the golden cups and plates which contained his daily food. So the ministers saw to it that his food was sent to him in silver cups and plates, and he gave away the silvers too, Then copper cups and plates were furnished, and he gave them away until at last only half a gooseberry was sent him in an earthen cup. The King asked his followers, "Who governs this land?" The followers said that he did. The King said, "Not so. I have fallen from the position of King. I possess only half a gooseberry." Soon he passed away So says Dibyavadana treatise. So does Visuddhi Magga. We should ponder upon the story of King Asoka and practise contentment and thus seek relief from misery.

 

THE BUDDHA WITHOUT FOLLOWERS

Once the Buddha who had usually had hundreds of followers around Him, was without any. One day as the Buddha was travelling, accompanied by his personal secretary Nagasamala thera, the secretary requested the Buddha to accept His alms bowl and robes and said that he would leave the Buddha. The Buddha was obliged to receive His own bowl and robes and walk His way alone. But that was not for long. Nagasamala thera was robbed of his own bowl and robe; by bad men and was beaten on the head, and so he went back to the Buddha.


Then again, the Buddha went to Jantu village along with a bhikkhu by the name of Meghiya. As they were walking across a mango grove, Meghiya said to the Buddha that he would like to do meditation in that grove and asked the Buddha to take His alms bowl and robes. The Buddha found this improper and asked Meghiya to wait for another bhikkhu to come along, but Meghiya was insistent. So the Buddha gave him the bowl and robes, and remained alone. The Buddha's solitary state was not too long.Meghiya went into the mango garden and sat upon a rock and began his meditation. As he was doing so, he was assailed by unseemly thoughts and desires. The reason for this was that on that very rock for one hundred previous existences of his, Meghiya has enjoyed sexual pleasures with dancers and handmaids; he was a king in those existences. So vestiges of his past pleasures were stuck on this rock, as it were, and he was unwittingly aroused by them in his thoughts. He had forgotten that he was a bhikkhu and thought himself as the king who was enjoying pleasures on this rock. And on this rock, too, he, as the king, had sentenced a robber to death for charges of robbery, and another to prison term for similar charges.


Meghiya was surprised at the unexpected unseemly thoughts that assailed him while he was meditating. Then he came to understand the reason for the Buddha's forbidding him to go into the grove to do meditation. And so he came back to the Buddha.


Then again, at Kosambi city a dispute arose among the monks upon the incident of leaving some water in the washing bowl in a latrine. It was not an important matter but the dispute developed, and the monks were split in two groups. The Buddha tried to patch up the differences but it was in vain, so He left Ghositarama monastery of that city and went into Palele jungle and remained there for the Lent all alone. Venerable Ananda was to have accompanied the Buddha but he knew that the Buddha wanted to remain alone. In Palele jungle a huge elephant attended upon in Buddha's needs. The Buddha went into Palele village to receive alms food. The villagers built a hut with a roof covered by leaves for the Buddha to live in. From secular point of view, the Buddha's condition of life for that period was unsatisfactory, but to the Buddha it was a life of real happiness, of peace of mind.


We all should ponder upon the Buddha's state of mind in such unfavourable living conditions and seek real happiness by cultivating peace of mind.


Secular-minded people would not like to be alone and would be sad to be alone and left to oneself. Who would ever want to be without companions, and who could ever avoid such a condition? Everybody will have to go through such conditions of deprivation, for it is the law of the world, Lokadhamma. The Buddha was left alone for some time in His final year of life, just before He passed into the state of parinibbanaThe Buddha was stopping at a large village called Medalupa about 24 miles from the city of Savutthi. King Pasenadi Kosala came to worship the Buddha. Before he entered the Buddha's living chamber, the King took off the regalia and entrusted it to Digha Karayana, a nephew of General Bandoola, himself a high army official, and the King entered alone. He made obeisance to the Buddha and conversed with him on matters relating to religion.


Meanwhile, Digha Karayana gave the regalia to the King's son, Vitatubha, and made him king. They left the old King at the monastery, leaving behind only a horse and a maid, and went to the capital city of Savutthi. When the old King came out of the Buddha's chamber, the maid reported the matter to him. The old King then decided to go to his nephew, King Ajatassattu, to seek the latter's help in fighting his usurper. The distance was 45 yujana (over 300 miles), so when the old King got to a rest-house on the outskirts of the city of Rajagaha, he died of illness and also from sheer exhaustion.


King Pasenadi Kosala was in those days a very powerful king in Middle India, but as ill -fate decreed, he died with no companion other than a handmaid and a horse in a rest-house outside a foreign capital city. It is a sad story, but it illustrates the workings of unfavourable circumstances according to the laws of life, Lokadhamma. So when we ponder upon the fate of this great king we can find relief from the sufferings occasioned by the onslaughts of Lokadhamma.

 

CALUMNY AND THE BUDDHA

The Buddha had all the attributes of noble ness and sacredness as evident in the Nine Great Attributes of the Buddha, and was therefore clean of all kinds of defilement and free of faults of any kind. There should be no pretext for any slander or criticism; on the contrary, there are many reasons and occasions for highest esteem for the Buddha. All the beings, human and celestial, hod been untiring in their praises, tributes and adoration. Yet the unbelievers who were dead against the Buddha tried their best to bring about occasions and invent excuses for calumny and slander for Him. These opponents had never failed to take every available opportunity to cast slanders and abuses on the Buddha and His teachings.

 

CINCAMANA'S ACCUSATIONS

The ditthiss (unbeliever's) persuaded a hermitess named Cincamana (Cincamanavika) to make accusations against the Buddha. Cincamana, dressed finely and properly, went toward Jetavana monastery at night-time and slept at a club house of the unbelievers near the monastery. In the early morning she hurried toward the city as if she had come out of Jetavana monastery. When passersby asked her why she was in a hurry and where she had slept, she replied coyly in a question form: "What can you gain from knowing what I have been doing?"


Cincamana had been doing like this for a month or so, and then when people enquired about her goings-on, she said by way of admission, "I went to Jetivana monastery and slept with Gotama." Three or four months later, she placed a bale of cloth on her stomach and tied it around her waist and covered it with her outer garment to make it look like a pregnancy. Then one day at a sermon meeting at Jetavana monastery Cincamana walked into the audience and made accusations saying, "Oh Great Monk, it is good that you have been giving sermons but you have neglected the pregnancy you have caused in me and failed to make arrangements for my confinement." That was the meanest attempt to put the Buddha to shame, but soon, owing to the great powers of the Buddha, the false bulge of the stomach slipped down. The audience was angry and drove Cincamana out of the monastery. The wicked hermitess was swallowed up by the earth when she got out of sight of the Buddha, and went directly down the deepest bowels of hell.

 

SUNDARI'S ACCUSATIONS

A similar case had occurred. Sundari, a beautiful hermitess of a gang of opposing unbelievers, did exactly as Cincamana had done. She loitered near Jetavana monastery and walked as if she had come out of the monastery. When asked by people, she said, I wont to Gotama and slept with him in his chamber." Then the unbeliever-gangsters paid money and asked bad hats to kill the girl and throw the corpse in a dust-bin near the monastery. Then they raised a rumour that Sundari was missing, and reported the case to King Kosala. When the King asked them if they could think of a possible place of crime, they said. "Lately, Sundari bad been living in Jetavana monastery. We don't know what has become of her." The gangsters pretended to make a search around the monastery. They then pointed to a dust-bin and exclaimed that the girl's corpse was in it, They placed the corpse on a cot and paraded in the streets for the citizens to see it. Then they reported to the King that Gotama's disciples killed the girl because they did not want her affair with their master to become known to the public. The King ordered without properly judging the case that the matter be made known to the public.


That was a good chance of the opposing unbelievers to make capital out of the incident. They went round the city and proclaimed that Gotama's disciples had killed the girl to conceal her affair with their master. Many of non-Ariyas misunderstood the disciples of the Buddha and cast slanders on them. The disciples sadly reported the matter to the Buddha. In reply to the charges, the Buddha gave the following sermon:


Abhutavidi nirayam upeti,
yo vapi katva na karomi caha.
Ubhopi te pecca sama bhavanti,
nihinakamma manuja parattha.


"He who makes false charges against another goes to hell; he who denies what he has done (that person also) goes to hell. These two wicked types of people equally get for their wicked deeds the award of falling into hell."


The bhikkhus repeated the Buddha's verse in Pali to the people, and those who cast slanderous remarks were frightened. They said among themselves, "Making false charges pushed one to hell. We did not see what had happened and would not know whether or not it happened as these persons had accused. They may have made false accusations. And then if they denied that they had done it, they would go to hell. It doesn't seem to be as these unbelievers have charged ." So the people stopped saying anything damaging to the monks. The slanderous campaign died down within a week.


King Kosala sent out spies and detectives to find out the truth in this case. The assassins who had killed Sundari were having a drinking party with the money they had received from the gangsters who had asked them to kill the girl. As they were getting drunk, one of them said to another, "Hey fellow, didn't you strike just one blow with the stick and kill Sundari? So you are now having a drinking party with the money you got for killing the girl, aren't you? All right! All right! So be it." The police officers who had heard this pounced upon the assassins and took them to the presence of the King. The King tried the case, and both the assassins and the unbelieving gangsters confessed. Then the King ordered them to go round the city and make public confessions. They were ordered to declare publicly that it was they who killed Sundari and that Gotama and his disciples were innocent. This public confession made the case clear and proved the innocence of the Buddha and his disciples, and people rid themselves of their misunderstanding.

 

THE STORY OF MAGANDI

Once the Buddha and the bhikkhus went to the city of Kosambhi. One of the reigning King Utena's wives, Queen Magandi, bribed bad hats and ordered them to go out and rail at the Buddha and His disciples as they entered the city. The reason for this action on Magandi's part was that Migandi bore a grudge against the Buddha. She was a very beautiful young lady and so her father, a brahmin, turned down all offers of marriage from the sons of high-class people. He used to tell them that they were not worth his daughter's hand. He was searching for a suitable bridegroom. The Buddha foresaw that the brahmin and his wife would become anagam, and so He went near the place the brahmin was holding a lighting festival.


Seeing the Buddha, brahmin Magandi said to himself "This man is cut above others. There won't be any equal of him in this world. This man, or this monk, is worthy of my daughter." So he accosted the Buddha saying, -'Sir, I have a beautiful daughter, and I wish to offer her to you. Will you please wait at this place ?" and hurried back home. When he arrived at his home he said to his wife. "Wife, I have just found a man suitable to be our daughter's husband. Follow me with year daughter, properly dressed." When the three of them came to the spot where the Buddha had been requested to wait, they found only the Buddha's footprint, which was purposely left for them to see


It was only when the Buddha willed that His footprint was impressed upon the earth. The footprint could not be erased during the period set by his will. And also it could be seen only by those whom tie had willed to see it. The brahmin's wife turned to her husband and asked: "Where is your bridegroom ?" The brahmin said, It is here that I have requested him to wait. Where is he gone now ?" and looked around, and pointing to the footprint said, "Ah, here's his footprint!"


The brahmin's wife was versed in the art of fortune-telling. She looked at the footprint and said, "The owner of this footprint is not the one who enjoys sex." The brahmin silenced her saying that her knowledge of veda (fortune telling art) was just little, and hurried after the Buddha. The brahmin said to the Buddha when he found Him, "Lord Bhikkhu, I do here by offer you my daughter to be at your service.


The Buddha did not reply to the brahmin directly. He said, "brahminMagandi, I will tell you something." Then He told the brahmin the story of His renunciation and His attainment of the Light and His stay for fifty days in seven places till he came to sit under the Ajapala banyan tree, and alsoMara's campaign against Him, Mara'sdaughters' enticements which failed and disappointed Mara. This the Buddha told the brahmin couple to let them understand that He was free of sexual desires. He also wanted the brahmin couple to gain an insight of the dhamma , and so He gave the following reply:


Disvina tanham, aratim, raginca,
nahosi chando api methunasmim,
Kimevidam muttakarisapunnam,
padapi nam samphusitum na icche.

"Although I had seen Tanha, Arati and Raga, the three daughters of Mara, sexual desire did not occur. It need not be said that seeing this girl, Magandi whose body is virtually stuffed with urine and excrement, did not arouse sexual desire. I have no desire even to touch her body with my foot."


The brahmin and his wife who heard this reply became anagam. They entrusted their daughter to the care of her uncle, Cula Magandi, and entered the Holy Order, soon becoming Arahats.

Magandi was angry when she heard the Buddha's reply. She was offended that the Buddha said that her body was a storehouse of urine and excrement- She said to herself, "Well, if he didn't want me, he should say so. Why did he say that I am full of excrement (faeces) and urine? That's downright derogatory." Then she continued saying to herself, "Well, let it be. I can get a good husband. Then 1 will show Gotama what I can do to him."


Her uncle presented her to King Utena, of Kosambi Kingdom. The King was pleased with Magandi's beauty and made her a queen. There were two other queens already. They were Vasula-datta, daughter of King Chandrapejjota, and Samavati, an adopted daughter of a rich man named Ghosaka. There were five hundred handmaids for each of the three queens.


The King gave eight kyats daily for Samavati to buy flowers. The money was handed to her slave Khujjuttra who had to go out daily to buy flowers. One day at the house of Sumana, the flower-seller, there was a feeding ceremony for the Buddha and the Sanghas. The flower-seller asked Khujjuttra to stay longer than usual to hear the Buddha's sermon after the meal. Khujjuttra attended the sermon and became a sotapan after the sermon.


As a sotapan, one strictly observes the five precepts. So Khujjuttra who had been pinching four kyats from the daily eight kyats, stopped doing it, and bought eight kyats' worth of flowers. When the queen saw more flowers than usual, she asked the slave woman, "Why, sister Khujjuttra? Did the King give you twice the usual allowance?"Khujjuttra said no. Then the queen asked her why there were so many flowers. A sotapan never tells a lie and is always strict in the observance of the five precepts. Khujjuttra who had then become a sotapan said that she had been stealing four kyats out of eight, and buying only four kyats' worth of flowers every day, but that day she had stopped stealing. When asked why, Khujjuttra said she had had an opportunity of hearing the Buddha's sermon at the house of the flower-seller and come to realize the dhamma, and so she had stopped her practice of pinching some money from the daily allowance given to buy flowers.


Here, if the queen were an evil-minded woman she would probably scold the slave woman and ask her to surrender the stolen money. But Queen Samavati was good-natured and had a mind of a person of parami (virtue). So, she was considerate. She pondered upon the change ofKhujjuttra's attitude and character. The queen reflected that the slave woman who said she had realized dhamma, stopped stealing and told the truth without fear. So the dhamma Khujjuttra had realized must be a sacred one, and it would be good to know that dhamma, Queen Samavati thought to herself. So she said to Khujjuttra: "Elder sister, please let us drink of the dhamma that you have imbibed." The slave-woman said that if she had to recount the sermon, she must first make herself neat and tidy. So she requested permission to take a bath and dress herself properly. She would do that in deference to the sacred dhamma that she was asked to recount.


After having taken a bath and dressed herself properly, Khujjuttra sat on the place where a preacher usually sat and recounted the Buddha's sermon properly and completely. Queen Samavati and her five hundred maids became sotapan after hearing the sermon.


From that day on, Khujjuttra was elevated to the position of a mother or a mentor and permitted to go to attend the Buddha's sermons. Khujjuttra came back to recount the sermons she had heard. In this way, Khujjuttra became the most informed of three pitaka; and was later bestowed upon by the Buddha with the credit of being the most informed of the dhamma among the lay women.


Having heard so often the sermons of the Buddha as recounted byKhujjuttra, Queen Samavati and her maids had a strong desire to see and worship the Buddha. So she asked Khujjuttra to take them to the Buddha. Khujjuttra said, "Ladies, it is nearly impossible for you all to go out of the palace (without the King's permission) because it is the King's house, as you may say so. So please bore small holes in the wall opposite the road so that you all may be able to look at and adore the Buddha and His disciples on their way to some rich man's house on invitation to a feast." The queen and the maids bored holes in the wall and peeped through and worshipped the Buddha and the Sangha. One day Magandi visited Samavati's chamber and saw the holes in the wall. She asked about them. Not knowing that Magandi had a grudge against the Buddha, Samavati told her that the Buddha was then in Kosambhi City and that they saw the Buddha and His disciples and worshipped them from inside the palace chamber. Magandi was enraged and said to herself, " Now the Buddha is in the city; I will do what I have wanted to do to him. These women are Gotama's disciples; I will do something to them, too." So she went to the King and maligned Samavati but her efforts were of no avail. Well, that's by the way. This is just a part of the story of the two queens.


Magandi gave money to her slaves and servants and asked them to go out and abuse the Buddha and drive Him out of the city. Those who did not believe in the Buddha's dhamma did as the evil queen had asked them. When the Buddha and His followers walked into the city, these unbelievers followed them on the roadside and shouted abuses of all kinds. For instance, they uttered, "You are a thief, a bad man, a camel, a bull, an ass, an animal, one who will go to hell. For you there is no heaven; there is only hell." That is terrible. Once one deviates from the right path, evil deeds multiply. These people were buying evil awards for their evil deeds; in fact, they gained nothing. After so many occasions of abuses, VenerableAnanda said to the Buddha, "Lord, this city is full of uncivilized persons. They have been abusing us for no apparent reasons. Let us go to another city." The Buddha asked, "What would you do when you went to another city where people there also abused us? Where would you go then?" Ananda replied, "Then, Sir, we would go on to another city."


The Buddha said, "Ananda, it is not advisable to move on to another place whenever we are abused. Any problem of riotous misbehaviour should be solved at the place where it occurs. Then only should we move on to another place." The Buddha said He had the courage to endure the abuses of evil persons. Thus He said:


Aham nagova sangame,
capato patitam saram.
Ativakyam titikkhissam,
dussilo hi bahujjano.


"Just as the great elephant on the war front endures the arrows coming from all sides, I, the Buddha will endure all the abusive words without a murmur. Many of the people are evil in their action and speech and are rough and rude."


Many people are unable to restrain their action and speech, and most of them are rude. One can live in the midst of such people only if one can tolerate their misbehaviour. So, the Buddha said. "just as the great elephant on the war front endures the arrows coming from all sides, I will endure the abuses." Continuing, He said to Ananda, "Ananda, do not worry. They will be able to abuse just for seven days. They will stop on the eighth day, and the situation will be calm and peaceful." It was so, as He had said. It was always the case with the mud-slinging campaign against the Buddha. That is why there is a Burmese saying to the effect that "Slander lasts seven days, so does praise."


Now, of the three cases of slander, accusation and abuse, the reason for the accusation of Cincamana originated far in the past. In the remote past, the would-be Buddha Gotama committed the sin of making false accusation of an Arahat named Nanda, a disciple of the BuddhaAbhibhu. So says the Apadan Pali text. Regarding the accusation in relation with Sundari, the would-be Buddha Gotama levelled unwarranted accusations against Pacceka Buddha namedSurabhi. The reason for the accusation against the five hundred monks in the case of Sundari is that these five hundred joined with their Master, the would-be Gotama Buddha, in the latter's false accusations against a holy hermit named Bhima who had attained jhana. There is no mention of the reason for being abused by Magandi. Anyway, the Buddha had to endure Magandi's abusive campaign because of a past sin of abusing a person against whom he should not have any grudge.


Sin is terrible; retribution for any sin could and did follow one, even if he was to be a Buddha, to the very end of the samsara. So we should be extremely careful in avoiding sins of any kind. And when one has to face slander, accusation and abuse, one should recall that even the Buddha had been obliged to face similar calumny and had endured it, and try to practice patience to be able to endure it.

 

PHYSICAL MISERY AND THE BUDDHA

Misery is of two kinds, physical and mental. As for mental misery, the Buddha was completely clean of it. When confronted by disappointments, dejections, sorrows, even the danger of death, the Buddha was free of mental misery. His mind was always clear. The same with an Arahat; even an anagam who has rid himself of dosa (anger) and mental defilements, has no mental misery. But in an anagam there linger some vestiges of avijja, bhava tanha and mana constituting kilesa, and so we cannot say that he is completely rid of mental misery. As for an Arahat, he is clean of kilesa, and is therefore free from mental misery. But as for physical misery, no one is exempt.


The Buddha was obliged to bear physical misery quite often. This is proved by what the Buddha sometimes said about His back-ache. According to the Apadan Pali text, the Buddha had to suffer from this physical misery because in one of His earlier existences He was a pugilist, and had caused pain to an opponent. Then again, when He was a son of a fisherman, He was delighted to see fish being beaten on the head. So it is said that the Buddha often had a head-ache.


Once, as the Buddha was taking a stroll on a terrace of the Mountain ofGijjhakuta, Devadatta rolled down a huge stone on Him. The stone struck the ridge jutting over the Buddha, and a shrapnel struck His leg, causing immense pain. The reason for that misery was that in one existence the would-be Buddha killed a cousin of his with a rock in a dispute over inheritance, and also that when he was a king he had had culprits speared to death. Then again, the reason for his suffering from diarrhea was that when he was a physician, he gave a rich man's son a medicine which caused looseness of bowels and blood motions.


And then, according to Samyutta Pali text, once Venerable Kassapa and Venerable Maha Moggalana suffered from an acute disease; so did the Buddha. But the disease disappeared after they had listened to Bojjhanga Dhamma.


Then again, the Buddha spent His 45 th, and last Lent at Veluva village near Vesali city.. At that time He suffered from a grave illness. which would have caused His passing away had He not gone into vipassana bhavana. He averted the eventuality because He saw that it. was not an appropriate time for passing into nibbana. He said so, and according to Atthakatha. Pali text, the Buddha went into vipassana bhavana just as vigorously as He had done on the eve of His attainment of Buddhahood. Today there are several instances in which a yogi practising meditation could stave off dire consequences from grave illness. We may say that these instances are of the same kind as the instance of overcoming diseases by Venerable Maha Kassapa and other Arahats and the Buddha by hearing recitation of Bojjhanga sutta and vipassana bhavana practice.


We can find relief and solace in the fact that even the Buddha had to face the Lokadham of physical misery. Especially in cases of severe illness and long drawn-out diseases hard to cure, the sufferer should ponder thus: "Even the Buddha cannot avoid such kind of Lokadham. What can be said for me then ? However, the Buddha suffered from physical misery but never from mental misery. So also I will endure so as to obviate mental misery." If you can afford to do meditation, you should ponder upon dukkha vedana(feeling of misery) by making a note of the feelings as they are as these feelings occur, without letting dosa and other ill deeds creep in. To an experienced practitioner of meditation, suffering can be endured and relief can be found.


The important thing is to reject the feelings of great sorrow by means of vipassana at the time when the sufferer comes to know that his end is very near or that even if he recovers he will probably be incapacitated for life and that his life will be useless. Dhamma is the best medicine for curing oneself of such anguish.


Supposing, one suffers from headache for a long time and suffers much from it because there is no effective medicine for the disease. If, how. ever, the medicine is available, the headache will go soon after taking the medicine. in the same way, if you don't have the medicine of meditation, you will suffer much and long from mental misery. The Buddha pondered thus: "This misery which occurs now is not permanent; it will disappear in due course. What I call "I" is after all a conglomeration of rupa and nama, and is not permanent; there is an incessant change, and this conglomeration is not attractive and cannot be depended upon: it is all misery. As there is a constant change of phenomena in this conglomerate, it is of the nature of anatta." Or the Buddha's disciple makes a note of the happening and disappearance of the phenomena in nama-rupa and ponder upon the anicca, dukkha and anatta nature of them, and thus knows the truth as it is. As he is doing so, there is no occasion for mental misery, and even if it occurs it will not last long. With the disappearance of mental misery, physical misery also disappears or can be said to disappear. If it does not, it will possibly be quite tolerable.


One does not feel elated by the good things of Lokadham nor does he feel sorrow for the bad things; thus one is free from anurodha or delight, or from virodha or disappointment and sorrow. So the Buddha said: "Thus delight or sorrow for the Lokadhamma excepted, the informed disciple of the Buddha is free from rebirth, old age and death."


When in this manner of meditation one gains vipassana insight and attains the four ariya magga nana; when one becomes an Arahat on reaching the stage of arahatta magga phala and in due course enters the state of nibbana, then there is no new existence, nor old age, nor death. Besides, as the Buddha said, "One is free from anxiety, sorrow and mourning, from physical misery and mental misery and deep distress."

 

FREE FROM ALL MISERY

The freedom from misery of all kinds that has been dealt with in the foregoing statements is for the present existence. When one becomes an Arahat and passes into the state of nibbana, all kinds of misery will disappear and peace will ensure. The Buddha made this assurance in conclusion.


The uninformed person, the puthujjana, does not realise the anicca, dukkha and anatta nature of all the phases of Lokadham, so he becomes elated when he comes by the good parts of Lokadham and feels dejected when the bad parts come up to him. At such a time of adversity he is overwhelmed with lobha and dosa, committing sins (akusala), and thus cannot escape from misery. As for the informed person, however, he perceives the vicissitudes of life in accordance with Lokadhamma, with a correct view and makes a note of them in the nature of anicca, dukkha and anatta. He is not overjoyed at the good turns in life nor is he dejected over the bad turns, nor overwhelmed by lobha and dosa. He has a good chance of doing good deeds and thus gaining merit, especially merit from meditation practice. So in the current life, he is free from mental misery, and when he attains arahatship and the state of nibbana, he will be completely free from misery of all kinds. The informed person has such qualities.

 

ACCORDING TO MANGALA SUTTA

According to Mangala sutta, the informed person is not moved by the onslaughts of Lokadhamma, but, on the other hand, the uninformed is greatly agitated. That is the significant difference. So the Buddha said:


Phutthassa lokadhammehi,
cittam yassa na kampati.
Asokam virajam khemam,
etam mangalamuttamam.


"Although attacked by the vicissitudes of life in accordance with Lokadhamma, the mind of the Arahat, or the informed person, who is a disciple of the Buddha is not shaken. There is no sorrow; there is no mist of kilesa (defilements); there is no danger or horror. That mind which is free from sorrow, kilesa or danger, is endowed with sacred auspiciousness of mangala."

We all should meet the onslaughts of Lokadham with the stable mind of an Arahat. If one has to endure like an Arahat, one must work to become an Arahat. If one cannot come up to that stage, one should strive for the stage of anagan or sakadagam or sotapan. In these three stages one cannot be entirely unmoved nor can one be stable in mind because one is not yet completely free from lobha and dosa. Yet when one has come up to the stage of sotapan one is sufficiently informed in the dhamma so that one can practise vipassana, ponder upon the anicca, dukkha and anatta nature of things fairly well and can thus endure the onslaughts of Lokadham.

Even if a yogi has not reached the stage of sotapan, he or she can tolerate the onslaughts to a certain extent by the practice of meditation. If the yogi has developed his or her concentration (samadhi) further and become aware of the distinctive nature of the phenomenon of rupa and of nama and is convinced that there is nothing attractive in these phenomena, then that yogi will be able to endure the onslaughts of Lokadham all the better. If the yogi has developed his or her samadhi still further and perceived the different phenomenon separately and in terms of anicca, dukkha and anatta, the endurance will be further strengthened, and relief will be greater.


If still further development of samadhinana can be achieved, and the yogi can perceive the incessant changes in the chain of action in the physical and mental parts of existence with equanimity, he or she will have attained sankha rupekkhanana. Tue yogi will then have acquired serenity and remained unmoved by rewards and punishments of Lokadham. There is no occasion for him or her for joy of sorrow. The yogi will be able to endure the onslaughts of either the good parts or the bad parts of Lokadham with an unshaken mind. Then the yogi will have the peace and serenity of an Arahat, if not as full as an Arahat, at least to some extent. If the yogi strives further to develop his or her meditation insight, vipassana nana, he or she will reach the ultimate stage of arahatta magga nana and become an Arahat, and will then be endowed with the sacred auspiciousness of mangala. We all should strive to reach that ultimate stage of mental stability.


Now we have come to the end of the discourse Lokadhamma which was given to you all as a mark of celebration of the New Year. May the audience of this meeting who have respectfully listened to this discourse be able to practice patience and endure the onslaughts of Lokadhamma by way of meditation of Lokadhamma so that they are totally eradicated and the serene happiness of nibbana prevails!

( Sadhu! Sadhu! Sadhu! )​

<hr>

End of discourse on Lokadhamma. (29-5-1970)​

<hr> <script language="JavaScript"> document.write(""); document.write("");